2019年3月18日,国务院公布了《国务院关于修改部分行政法规的决定》(“国务院决定”),并于公布当日起开始施行。引人注意的是,该决定对《技术进出口管理条例》作出修改,删去了其中关于技术进口合同不得含有限制性条款以及改进技术成果权属等规定。本文旨在对修改的内容和其可能对跨境技术交易可能产生的影响进行解读。
Continue Reading 聚焦《技术进出口管理条例》的修改
Intellectual Property
足协新规四大帽:要点解读
2018年岁末,中国足协通过的新规“四大帽”出台,配合支出和亏损限额等措施,给中超上了一罐凉茶,由此拉开了中超“去火”大幕。…
Continue Reading 足协新规四大帽:要点解读
从运动员兴奋剂拒检争端,了解国际反兴奋剂管理制度
世界反兴奋剂工作进行多年,各反兴奋剂组织均十分重视,我国与 WADA 对兴奋剂违规行为的“零容忍”做法始终保持同步。…
Continue Reading 从运动员兴奋剂拒检争端,了解国际反兴奋剂管理制度
Doing Business in Australia | Brand Protection
Australia has extensive intellectual property laws that can protect the branding and ideas associated with most business ventures. …
Continue Reading Doing Business in Australia | Brand Protection
在澳大利亚经商 | 品牌保护
澳大利亚拥有大量知识产权法律,能够保护与大多数数商业活动相关的品牌和创意。在澳大利亚,受保护知识产权的主要形式包括商标、版权、专利和设计。…
Continue Reading 在澳大利亚经商 | 品牌保护
技术交易前景知识产权 | 对改进技术的限制以及涉外技术交易中的适用问题
我国合同法尊重技术合同合作方的意思自治,允许当事人之间就前景知识产权的归属、使用和处置自由约定。…
Continue Reading 技术交易前景知识产权 | 对改进技术的限制以及涉外技术交易中的适用问题
China Established a Centralized IP Appellate Tribunal
On 1 January 2019, the Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) officially established an appellate-level intellectual property tribunal (“SPC IP Tribunal”), which is somewhat similar to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in terms of its function and role, in accordance with the Decision of the Standing Committee of National People’s Congress on Several Issues Concerning Litigation Procedures of Patent and other IP Cases dated 26 October 2018.
Continue Reading China Established a Centralized IP Appellate Tribunal
技术交易前景知识产权 | 遇见前景知识产权——技术合同的常见分歧点
在对前景知识产权完全归属一方的安排不能达成一致的情况下,很多合作方选择简单约定由双方共有,或一些跨境的技术交易会约定根据前景知识产权的产生地法律规定来决定。这看似是一条解决问题的捷径,但从法律角度来讲,这只是在一定程度上把问题拖延到下一阶段来商议解决,而且考虑到不同类型的知识产权在不同管辖区域的法律法规的差异性,这样安排反而可能造成更大的不确定性。…
Continue Reading 技术交易前景知识产权 | 遇见前景知识产权——技术合同的常见分歧点
A Comprehensive Guide to Electronic Signature, from a Legal Perspective
When sending red packets on WeChat or making purchases on Taobao for the first few times, one might have this question in mind or for their friends: is it reliable, sending or receiving money with just a tap on the smartphone or a click of the mouse? They are no magic, just increasingly popular applications of electronic signature, or e-signature, in our daily life in an era of Internet and digital technology. In addition to the e-commerce scenarios above, it is already a common practice to transmit and retain files in electronic formats for business activities. However, legal instruments which are customarily regarded as more rigorous than e-commerce transactions are still generally forbidden or unnoticed for the application of electronic signature. In practice, when it is required to execute legal instruments officially, people would still print them out and affix their seals or signatures physically as they traditionally do. This would inevitably incur significant time costs for the execution process. Moreover, given the persistent issue of “fake stamps”, this time-consuming traditional approach may not necessarily render a higher reliability.
Continue Reading A Comprehensive Guide to Electronic Signature, from a Legal Perspective
英律师煮酒论IP │职务发明?咋整?
在这里,看懂IP交易—霞飞路的小酒馆里,IP交易专家英律师一樽煮酒,拆解各类IP交易。连载系列,带你一同诗酒趁年华,仗剑IP天涯。…
Continue Reading 英律师煮酒论IP │职务发明?咋整?
