On 15 December 2020, the National Expert Training Course for Trademark Examination and Review was held in Guiyang. He Zhimin, deputy director of the China National Intellectual Property Administration(CNIPA), attended the course, emphasizing that: in 2021, CNIPA will further intensify its efforts to crack down on bad faith trademark registrations.
Continue Reading CNIPA Intensifies the Crackdown on Bad Faith Registrations

On December 14, 2020, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released the first batch of intellectual property administrative enforcement guiding cases (Guiding Cases No.1 to No.5), aiming to unify law enforcement standards, improve case handling level, and guide the work of intellectual property administrative enforcement.
Continue Reading CNIPA Announces First Batch of IPR Administrative Enforcement Guiding Cases – Trademark Cases

Continue Reading 「最高人民法院による知的財産権の民事訴訟の証拠に関する若干の規定」に対する論評

On 11 November 2020, lawmakers at the 23rd session of the 13th National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee deliberated and voted to adopt the Decision on Revising the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China, marking the completion of the decade-long third amendment to the Copyright Law (hereinafter referred to as the “Amendment”). The newly amended Copyright Law (hereinafter referred to as the “2020 Copyright Law”) consists of 67 articles in six chapters, and shall come into force as of 1 June 2021.
Continue Reading The Amended Copyright Law and Its Potential Implications

Continue Reading 待望の著作権法、懸命な努力の末についに可決

On November 16, 2020, the Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) released Several Provisions of Supreme People’s Court on Evidence in Intellectual Property Civil Litigation (“Provisions”). The Provision consists of 33 Articles and has gone into effect on November 18, 2020. On the whole, the Provision is a summary of intellectual property judicial practice, perfecting regulations in relation to evidence submission and obstruction, evidence preservation and forensic appraisal, evidence cross-examination and recognition, damage compensation, etc., so as to appropriately reduce the burden of proof by right holders and effectively resolve problems of “difficulty in adducing evidence” and “high enforcement cost” encountered by intellectual property rights holders in civil litigations. Thus, it is of positive significance to strengthen judicial protection for intellectual property rights. The main contents of the Provision are analyzed as follows.
Continue Reading Overview of SPC’s Provisions on Evidence in IP Civil Litigation

In the top 10 patent reexamination & invalidation cases of 2019 announced by the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), five are related to mechanical technologies.  According to the CNIPA, these cases were selected for their guiding value in certain topics typical for patent examination, as well as the considerable social attention focused on them.  The opinions reflected in the Decisions of these cases would undoubtedly impose great influence on the practices of both substantial examination and invalidation, and can be cited as supporting reference or evidence to benefit similar cases.  Therefore, we summarize below the case brief and introduce the focuses of the five invalidation cases of mechanical invention.
Continue Reading Introduction to 2019 Top Ten Patent Reexamination/Invalidation Cases(Mechanical)