Skip to content

menu

Home - 首页About - 关于金杜Services - 专业领域Contact - 联系我们
English中文
King & Wood logo
Example Link China Banking Regulatory Commission China Insurance Regulatory Commission China Securities Regulatory Commission General Administration of Customs Ministry of Commerce National Development and Reform Commission Pacific Rim Advisory Council State Administration for Industry & Commerce State Administration of Foreign Exchange Supreme People’s Court World Law Group RSS LinkedIn Weibo
China Law Insight logo
Home » China is to Negotiate an Intergovernmental Agreement with the US to Implement FATCA

China is to Negotiate an Intergovernmental Agreement with the US to Implement FATCA

By King & Wood on August 6, 2013
Posted in Banking & Finance, compliance, Corporate

By King & Wood Mallesons’ Compliance Group

The US promulgated the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA“) in March 2010, in order to strengthen the taxation over offshore investment (such as offshore financial assets and offshore accounts) by US persons. Following that, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS“) of the US published the corresponding Final Regulation and a series of implement timing arrangements.

Under FATCA, the participating Foreign Financial Institutions (“FFIs“) are required to register with IRS and fulfill the following obligations:

  • For pre-existing accounts, to search the account information, and to identify the reportable accounts hold by US persons or foreign entities owned by US persons (“Reportable US Account“);
  • For new accounts, to identify and verify Reportable US Accounts in due diligence procedures;
  • To report on an annual basis the relevant information with respect to Reportable US Accounts;
  • To deduct and withhold a tax equal to 30% of certain payments made to recalcitrant account holders or non-participating FFIs;
  • Upon request, to report additional information with respect to Reportable US Accounts; and
  • In any case where any foreign law would prevent the reporting of such information:
  1. to attempt to obtain a waiver from the account holder, or
  2. to close such account.

For non-participating FFIs, the counter measure is that when a US source payment is made to such non-participating FFIs by a payer who is a participating FFI, the payer will withhold 30% of the amount of such payment.

In accordance with §1471(d)(5) of FATCA and §1.1471-5(e) of the Final Regulation of FATCA, a Financial Institution, as referred to in the term “FFI”, refers to any entity that:

  • accepts deposits in the ordinary course of a banking or similar business (depository institution);
  • holds, as a substantial portion of its business, financial assets for the benefit of one or more other persons (custodial institution);
  •  is an investment entity;
  • is an insurance company or a holding company that is a member of an expanded affiliated group that includes an insurance company, and the insurance company or holding company issues, or is obligated to make payments with respect to, a cash value insurance or annuity contract (specified insurance company); or
  • is an entity that is a holding company or treasury center with certain characteristics.

As far as the financial institutions in the PRC are concerned, the following entities may be classified as FFIs under FATCA:

  • Financial institutions in the banking sector, e.g. commercial banks (including domestic funded commercial banks and foreign funded commercial banks), rural banks, rural financial cooperatives and PRC branches of foreign banks;
  •  Securities companies;
  • Investment funds and products, e.g. securities investment funds, collective investment trusts, collective asset management schemes of securities companies, asset management schemes for certain customers of fund management companies, asset management schemes of futures companies, and asset management schemes of asset management companies of insurance companies; and
  •  Insurance companies, e.g. life insurance companies, property insurance companies, and re-insurance companies.

The key dates with respect to the implementation of FATCA, in accordance with the notice issued by IRS most recently on July 12, 2013 (Notice 2013-43) are as follows:

As FATCA is a US domestic law, an FFI’s participation in FATCA shall be within the legal framework of the place where such FFI is located. Therefore, the US government is keen to enter into intergovernmental agreements with other countries so as to facilitate the implementation of FATCA in such jurisdictions. As of July 12, 2013, the following countries have signed such agreements with the US government respectively: Denmark, Ireland, Mexico, Norway, UK, Germany, Spain, Switzerland and Japan.

According to the Release of Joint Outcomes of the Economic Track under the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue V (published on the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC on July 12, 2013), “the Chinese government and the US government agree that each government will exert its best effort to enter into an inter-governmental agreement (“IGA“) to implement FATCA before the deadline of January, 2014. In order to seek for a cooperation scheme for the implementation of FATCA, the US Treasury, IRS, Ministry of Finance of the PRC, State Administration of Taxation of the PRC and People’s Bank of China undertake that a discussion for the next round will be launched as early as possible in the summer of 2013”.

When the Sino-US IGA is signed, the relevant financial institutions in the PRC shall comply with and fulfill the due diligence and reporting obligations as set out in such IGA.

As it is not clear when China and the US will sign the IGA and the implementation dates of FATCA are coming near, the relevant financial institutions in the PRC would better get prepared in advance, and take certain measures so as to face the implementation of FATCA:

  • Determining whether it is an FFI regulated by FATCA;
  • Determining whether it is affected by the implementation of FATCA and the extent it may be affected;
  • To the extent permitted by the PRC law, preparing to register with IRS, establishing corresponding due diligence policies and procedures, and revising the standard documentation so as to collect the requisite information required for the due diligence procedure and to obtain authorization for information reporting; and

Assessing the legitimacy and compliance under the PRC law of the due diligence policies and procedures and the actual reporting of information.

Tags: china, English, FATCA, FFI, Final Regulation, financial institution, IGA, intergovernmental agreement, IRS, US account
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
中国人民银行《动产和权利担保统一登记办法》评述
December 31, 2021
可持续银行融资简介
October 18, 2021
东莞农村商业银行H股香港主板上市
October 18, 2021
King & Wood logo
Our People

Subscribe By Email

Topics – 分类

Archives – 历史文章

RECENT UPDATES – 最近更新

  • RWA代币监管新基石——RWA代币新规的思考与机遇
  • 全球反洗钱执法加码,中国非金融机构合规责任再强化
  • 马丘比丘的崛起丨秘鲁矿业投资关注要览
  • 见微知著,合规为要——从典型案例看跨境电商进口食品合规要求与风险防范
  • 转包和违法分包人已经起诉发包人支付工程款的,实际施工人能否申请作为第三人参加诉讼或者另行起诉发包人在欠付工程款范围内承担责任?

Links – 友情链接

  • China Banking Regulatory Commission
  • China Insurance Regulatory Commission
  • China Securities Regulatory Commission
  • General Administration of Customs
  • Ministry of Commerce
  • National Development and Reform Commission
  • Pacific Rim Advisory Council
  • State Administration for Industry & Commerce
  • State Administration of Foreign Exchange
  • Supreme People’s Court
  • World Law Group
China Law Insight logo
King & Wood logo
RSS LinkedIn Weibo
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About our Firm

金杜成立于1993年,是中国最早批准设立的合伙制律师事务所之一。作为在中国内地、香港特别行政区、日本、美国、加拿大等重要法域拥有执业能力的律师事务所,金杜在全球最具活力的经济区域都拥有相当的规模和法律资源优势。

金杜拥有520多名合伙人和1700多名专业人员。其23个办公室位于北京、上海、上海临港、杭州、南京、苏州、无锡、广州、深圳、香港特别行政区、横琴(澳门联营)、海口、三亚、成都、重庆、青岛、济南、长春、东京、纽约、硅谷、洛杉矶、温哥华,并通过与安睿顺德伦(国际)(Eversheds Sutherland (International))律师事务所与亚洲法律服务网络(King & Wood Circle)深度合作,进一步扩展了在亚太、欧洲、中东、非洲、美洲的服务网络,覆盖全球逾30个国家。

Read More...
Copyright © 2026, King & Wood All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo