Barri Mendelsohn 伦敦办公室 金杜律师事务所

概述

新冠肺炎疫情导致许多个人和企业纷纷向英国法院提出自己的权利主张。由于法院在今年3月至6月底一直处于关闭状态，虚拟听证会又刚刚开始使用，于是英国法院出现了前所未有的案件积压。 Continue Reading 英国法在新冠肺炎疫情背景下的相关诉讼中提出额外的权利主张不一定会获得法院的支持

2020年12月11日，中国银行保险监督管理委员会（简称“银保监会”）批准招商银行与京东数科全资子公司——网银在线（北京）商务服务有限公司（简称“网银在线”）共同筹建招商拓扑银行股份有限公司（简称“招商拓扑银行”）。招商拓扑银行是自中信百信银行股份有限公司（简称“百信银行”）在2017年成立后，银保监会批准的中国境内第二家独立法人直销银行。 Continue Reading 招商银行获批筹建设立独立法人直销银行

On 19 December 2020, the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) and the Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) jointly released the “Measures for the Security Review of Foreign Investment (《外商投资安全审查办法》)” (the “Measures”)[1], which will become effective from 18 January 2021. The issuance of the Measures is a clear signal that the Chinese government is taking a more active approach in relation to national security review on foreign investments (“NSR”).
In this article, we will briefly explain the background of the promulgation of the Measures, introduce the main contents from both substantive and procedural perspectives as well as discuss the potential impacts upon future foreign investments in China.

Background for Promulgation of the Measures

According to the NDRC’s spokesperson, the Measures were promulgated against the following background:[2]

  • Based on 10 years of experience in national security reviews (“NSR”) in China: Back in February 2011, the General Office of the State Council issued the Notice on Establishment of Security Review System Pertaining to Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (《国务院办公厅关于建立外国投资者并购境内企业安全审查制度的通知》) (the “Notice”) . This marked the genesis of China’s NSR regime.[3] Although few cases of NSR have been made public, the Chinese authorities have accumulated experience in conducting NSR in the last 10 years.
  • Fleshing out requirements set out in the Foreign Investment Law: The Foreign Investment Law of the PRC[4] (《中华人民共和国外商投资法》) , which became effective on 1 January 2020 set in place formally that the NSR would become a feature of China’s foreign investment regulatory regime. Since then, foreign investors and other interested parties have been awaiting details as to how NSR will be implemented in practice.
  • Responding to recent developments of NSR in other major jurisdictions: In recent years, major jurisdictions, including the U.S., European Union, India, Australia, Germany, Japan and UK, have either enacted or further expanded the scope of their existing NSR related laws. COVID-19 has also greatly heightened both economic and security concerns on the part of governments around the world. The promulgation of the Measures is also a response by China to the fast changing regulatory landscape worldwide.

Main Contents of the Measures

The Measures consists of 23 Articles detailing:

(1) Review Authority of NSR

According to the Measures, the State will establish a working mechanism office (工作机制办公室)(the “NSR Office”) which shall be responsible for organizing, coordinating and guiding NSR in respect of foreign investments. The NSR Office will be set up under and led by NDRC whereas NDRC and MOFCOM jointly undertake routine NSR work.[5]

KWM Comments:

Based on our experiences, NDRC and MOFCOM may also consult with competent industry regulators that are relevant to specific transactions. These may include, amongst others, the Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the People’s Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission etc. In such cases, NDRC and MOFCOM are likely to carry out the NSR review in conjunction with the relevant regulators.

(2) Scope of Transactions Covered by the NSR

The Measures provide that the following types of transactions will fall within the scope of the NSR:

(a) any foreign investment in a new project or establishment of new enterprise in China alone or jointly with other investors;

(b) any foreign investor’s acquisition of equity or assets of a domestic enterprise through merger or acquisition; or

(c) any foreign investment in China through any other measure. [6]

KWM Comments:

(1) Compared with the rules set out by the Notice and the Security Review Provision (together the “Previous Rules”), the Measures expanded the types of transactions falling within the scope of NSR. Under the Previous Rules, acquisition of domestic enterprises by foreign investors are subject to NSR if the transaction impacts national security. The Measures are broader and apply to all foreign investments in China, whether directly or indirectly and regardless as to whether the target is a foreign-invested-enterprise (“FIE”) or domestic enterprise. It should also be noted that the scope is not limited to M&A transactions, but will also apply to green-field projects.

(2) The Measures have a catch all provision “foreign investments in China through other measures”. The Previous Rules provide that foreign investors shall not evade the NSR by means of nominal shareholders, trust, multiple-layer investment, lease, loan, control agreement, offshore transactions, etc. We understand that a similar approach may be taken under the Measures, e.g. control by agreement / variable interest entity (“VIE”) structure or reinvestment through a foreign invested enterprise would fall within the scope of NSR.

(3) Industry Sectors Covered by the NSR

The Measures separate industry sectors caught within the NSR into two categories:

1st Category

Any foreign investment will be subject to NSR (regardless control or not)

2nd Category

Investments resulting in the target being foreign controlled will be subject to NSR
Sectors included

Military industry

Military industrial supporting facilities or other fields relating to the security of national defence;

Investments in areas surrounding military facilities and military industry facilities.

 

Critical agricultural products;

Critical energy and resources;

Critical equipment manufacturing;

Critical infrastructure;

Critical transport services;

Critical cultural products and services;

Critical information technology and Internet products and services;

Critical financial services;

Critical technologies;

Other critical fields relating to national security.

 

KWM Comments:

(1) In addition to the industry sectors covered by the Previous Rules, the Measures add the following new areas to the NSR’s scope: critical information technology and Internet products and services, critical financial services and critical cultural products and services. However, the Measures do not set out a clear definition of these sectors and thus, as is typically the case, leave a wide discretion to the regulators in interpreting their scope.

(2) The assessment whether a target will be “controlled” by foreign investors will rest on the following “actual control” standards: (a) if the foreign investor holds more than 50% equity in the target; or (b) if the foreign investor holds less than 50% equity but exercises significant impact in the board of directors, board of shareholders or general meeting of shareholder by means of voting rights; or (c) other circumstances where the foreign investor may have a significant impact on the target’s business decision-making, human resources, finance, technology etc. This seems to be even wider than the control standards under China’s merger control regime.

(4) Initiation of the NSR and the Reviewing Procedure

The NSR Office can accept filings by the parties, but can also initiate requests to the parties to make a filing if the NSR Office considers the transaction falls within the NSR scope.

Parties cannot close a transaction during the review procedure.[7] In the event the transaction has been closed before a review decision is made, the NSR Office has authority to unwind the transaction or order divestment. [8] It is noteworthy that, there is no time limit for the Office to investigate or prohibit the transaction if it has impacts to the national security.

After receiving the application from the parties, the NSR Office has 15 working days to decide whether the transaction is subject to NSR. If the transaction is subject to NSR, the NSR Office will have 30 working days under the general procedure, and further 60 working days (with a possible extension) under the special procedure. For the detailed procedure, please see below the flowchart.

KWM Comments:

The procedure rules in the Measures substantially follow the rules that are currently in place. In practice, for transactions with national security concerns, the review time can be much longer, as the time spent by the parties in preparing supplemental submissions or in amending the investment plan is not counted.

Compared with Previous Rules, the Measures introduce new mechanisms such as a pre-filing consultation mechanism (Article 5), whistle-blower mechanism (Article 15) and joint disciplinary mechanism (Article 19). These new mechanisms show the Chinese authorities are stepping up efforts in NSR enforcement.

(5) Possible outcomes of NSR decisions

The Measures provide the following outcomes for NSR decisions:

  • Approval: If proposed foreign investment does not impact national security, then the transaction will pass the NSR.
  • Prohibition: If the proposed foreign investment is considered to have an impact on national security, then the NSR Office may prohibit the investment.
  • Approval with conditions attached: If the NSR Office considers that an impact to national security could be eliminated by attaching conditions, then the parties may commit in writing to accept such conditions and the NSR Office may conditionally approve the transaction.

KWM Comments:

At present there is no public precedent of a conditional NSR approval in China. It remains to be seen how NDRC and MOFCOM will impose conditional approvals in practice. However, considering the legal enforcement in similar fields in China (e.g. for merger control review from an antitrust perspective) and the practice of NSR regime in other major jurisdictions, we expect likely conditions may include the following:

  • Structural conditions such as divestitures of core technology, IP, data, or key contracts/assets related to supplying the government or key Chinese customers. In extreme circumstances there may be an order to divest all or part of the China business.
  • Behavioral conditions such as restrictions on access to key technology or data or transmission of data overseas; appointing a Chinese based trustee to handle certain products/services and ensuring that relevant business activities are carried out in China; appointment of a Chinese government-approved security officer to ensure compliance.

Impacts on Foreign Investments to China:

The Measures pledge any further foreign investments that may impact national security will be subject to greater scrutiny by Chinese authorities. This echoes the global movement towards adopting more stringent review regimes. However, it is worth noting that the Measures are actually far less onerous than regimes in many other jurisdictions. Not only is the list of affected sectors more narrowly defined, but the control standard to be met for most of the investments falling within the NSR scope is also relatively high in comparison with regimes in other jurisdictions. Accordingly, for the vast majority of the foreign investments in China, the direct impact upon such foreign investments would likely be modest.

But for players whose business are relevant to the affected areas, NSR will no doubt add complexity to doing transactions in China, by not only impacting the deal timeline, but also giving rise to uncertainty in deal closing and potential conditions to be imposed. The recent popular sectors for investments such as technology, internet, and financial services may well be captured by the expanded scope of the Measures. Given the broad-brush approach of the Measures and the NSR Office’s wide discretion, investors are well advised to conduct a thorough NSR assessment for transactions and ensure compliance with NSR filings.

Xu Ping, Liu Cheng, Mark, Li Yumeng, Corporate & Commercial Group, King & Wood Mallesons

 

 

 

 

We’d like to thank Torres Nicholas Louis (Nick) and Ye Hongtao for their contribution for this article.

[1] Measure for the Security Review of Foreign Investment (《外商投资安全审查办法》) (Decree No.37 of the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce) promulgated by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce on 19 December 2020.

[2] See Completing the Security Review of Foreign Investment to Protect a Higher Level of Opening-up – Answering Reporters’ Question regarding the Measures on Security Review of Foreign Investment by the Head of the Office of Foreign Investment Security Review (《健全外商投资安全审查制度 为更高水平对外开放保驾护航——外商投资安全审查工作机制办公室负责人就<外商投资安全审查办法>答记者问》), https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwdt/xwfb/202012/t20201219_1255024.html

[3] After that, MOFCOM issued the Provisions on Implementation of Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (《商务部实施外国投资者并购境内企业安全审查制度的规定》) (“Security Review Rules”) which provided more detailed procedural rules for NSR. These rules basically set up the legal framework of China’s NSR regime.

[4] Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China (《中华人民共和国外商投资法》) (Presidential decree No.26) promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress

[5] See Article 3 of the Measures.

[6] See Article 2 of the Measures

[7] See Article 8 of the Measures.

[8] See Article 12 of the Measures.

叶永青，马晓煜，宋丹丹 合规业务部 金杜律师事务所

一、前言

近年来，共享经济对传统的企业用工模式和薪酬福利管理都带来了巨大挑战。在疫情影响的经济下行期，员工福利平台和拥有委托代征资质的灵活用工平台因为能够解决企业和员工的诸多痛点而备受青睐。两类平台虽在具体业务模式等方面存在较大的差异，但站在税收和企业成本管理的角度，都主要是因为在个人所得税和企业社保支出上能够提供一定的灵活安排而被大量的采用。 Continue Reading 税务和刑事合规监管下的员工福利和灵活用工平台，路在何方？

2020年12月15日，深信服科技股份有限公司（简称“深信服”）创业板向特定对象发行的4,801,848股股份于深圳证券交易所上市。本次发行于2020年8月27日获深圳证券交易所审核通过，于2020年10月12日获中国证监会同意注册。本次发行募集资金总额人民币888,389,898.48元，发行对象为中国国际金融股份有限公司、林芝腾讯科技有限公司、嘉实基金管理有限公司、上海高毅资产管理合伙企业（有限合伙）。

深信服专注于软件和信息技术服务行业，主营业务为向企业级用户提供信息安全、云计算、基础网络与物联网相关的产品和解决方案，致力于让企业级用户的IT更简单、更安全、更有价值，凭借二十年的持续创新、优秀的产品和服务，现已发展成为国内具有核心竞争力和市场领先地位的企业。

在本项目中，金杜担任发行人律师，全力协助客户完成本次发行各项相关工作，全程提供了全面、系统、专业、高效的法律服务，获得了发行人及其他中介团队的高度评价。

本项目的主办合伙人为王立新、杨茹、孙昊天。

 

宁宣凤 张若寒 金晓甜 合规业务部 金杜律师事务所

在当下广受关注的互联网经济之一——“社区团购”领域，各大巨头正在利用海量数据、先进算法和雄厚资本，争夺社区的生鲜团购。然而，卖菜并没有像打车、单车、外卖一样，迅速成为一个炙手可热的网络经济。升温的，反而是反垄断监管。

Continue Reading 风口“撞上”反垄断，创新是关键

Executive Summary

The High Court in Dodika Ltd v United Luck Group Holdings Ltd [2020] EWHC 2101 (Comm) recently held that a buyer’s provision of a notice in respect of a claim under a tax covenant contained in a share sale and purchase agreement was invalid. Continue Reading Watch out Buyers: Despite actual knowledge, notices for claims must include sufficient detail

概要

近日，英国高等法院审理了Dodika Ltd 诉United Luck Group Holdings Ltd [2020] EWHC 2101(Comm)一案，并在判决中指出，买方就股份买卖协议中税务承诺提出的索赔所发出的通知无效。 Continue Reading 买方注意：即使卖方实际知晓，索赔通知必须包含充分的细节

2020年12月15日，国际权威法律评级机构钱伯斯（Chambers and Partners）公布了《2021亚太法律指南》（2021 Asia-Pacific Guide）榜单，金杜律师事务所共有24个业务领域入榜，19个业务领域获得第一等排名，64位合伙人获得“领先律师”的称号，10位合伙人获得 “业界元老”、 “业界贤达”以及“律政之星”称号， 14位合伙人被评为第一等领先律师，4位合伙人首度跻身榜单。

钱伯斯也于近期公布了《2021钱伯斯金融科技指南》（Chambers FinTech 2021）榜单。金杜律师事务所在澳大利亚、中国内地以及香港特别行政区三个法域再度蝉联第一等排名。

赵炎 曹琳琳 合规业务部 金杜律师事务所

为了鼓励科技型企业的发展，支持企业开展创新和研发活动，《企业所得税法》规定符合条件的高新技术企业可以在三年内减按15％的税率缴纳企业所得税（标准税率为25%）。 Continue Reading 从典型案例看高新技术企业实务操作常见问题