By Qian YaozhiXia Dongxia, Liu Xiangwen & Zhou We King and Wood Mallesons’ Dispute Resolution Group

The Haifu Case is the first case in China where a court has denied the validity of an agreement containing a valuation adjustment mechanism (“VAM Agreement”). It has caused drastic reactions in the PE industry, and not surprisingly, the retrial of this case by the Supreme People’s Court of China (the “Supreme Court”) has also attracted intense public attention. Recently, the Supreme Court has given its retrial judgment, where the Supreme Court (i) corrects the lower courts’ decisions that completely deny the validity of the VAM agreement, and (ii) distinguishes VAM agreements between shareholders and the company from that between the shareholders only, and affirms the validity of the latter. This retrial judgment can be expected to have considerable influence on the controversial issue of validity of VAM agreement, and to generate significant implications for PE investors as for how to protect their interest.
Continue Reading The Haifu Case Review –Interpreting the Supreme People’s Court’s Retrial Judgment And It’s Implications for PE Investors

作者:张保生  陈湘林 金杜律师事务所争议解决

1、根据中国法律,认定合同无效的标准是什么?

根据《合同法》(1999年)第52条,如果合同存在如下五种情形之一,将被认定为无效:(一)一方以欺诈、胁迫的手段订立合同,损害国家利益;(二)恶意串通,损害国家、集体或者第三人利益;(三)以合法形式掩盖非法目的;(四)损害社会公共利益;(五)违反法律、行政法规的强制性规定。

 在司法实践中运用上述规定需要注意:

第一,根据最高人民法院《关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释(二)》(法释〔2009〕5号)第十四条,“合同法第五十二条第(五)项规定的‘强制性规定’,是指效力性强制性规定。”
Continue Reading 外商投资企业的合同效力和审批中的常见问题解答—-跨国公司在华诉讼系列(IV)