2020年12月18日，深圳市资本运营集团有限公司（简称“深圳资本集团”）完成了对上市公司中国国际海运集装箱（集团）股份有限公司（股票代码：000039.SZ、02039.HK，简称“中集集团”）29.74%股份的收购过户登记手续，深圳资本集团顺利成为中集集团的第一大股东，本次交易金额达人民币105.09亿元。 Continue Reading 深圳资本集团收购中集集团29.74%股份并成为第一大股东

王风利、李文强、王祖晨 争议解决部 金杜律师事务所

问题的提出

提示付款，一般指汇票持票人向付款人出示汇票而请求其支付票据金额的行为。通常情况下，提示是付款的必经程序，汇票到期后，持票人向付款人提示付款被拒绝的，持票人才能够对背书人、出票人以及汇票的其他债务人行使追索权。 Continue Reading 民商事诉讼、执行疑难问题系列一：汇票持票人可否自行向付款人提示付款？

康军、刘致远 纽约办公室 金杜律师事务所

尽管2020年的新冠疫情令美国经济和众多企业受到冲击，过去一年内美国新设企业的增长率却达到了近十年来的最高水平[1]。对于已经成功迈出第一步的初创企业来说，下一阶段的重要考量之一便是如何募集更多外部投资助推公司成长。除美国本土资本外，美国初创公司也吸引了大量国际资本和美国境外基金的投资，而当多数外部投资来自于美国境外时，这些投资者可能更倾向于通过开曼群岛等离岸持股平台投资美国初创公司，有助于未来资本筹划的灵活性。为实现这一结构，美国初创公司需要进行离岸融资重组（如创始人股权上翻 + 投资人认购），但是该类跨境重组会涉及一系列美国联邦所得税问题。

Continue Reading 美国初创公司离岸融资重组的税务考量

2020年12月18日，金杜律师事务所正式上线乌鲁木齐、呼和浩特、南宁、西宁、福州、厦门以及拉萨共7家云办公室，这是自今年4月发布首批7家云办公室，10月发布第二批10家云办公室之后发布的第三批云办公室。至此，金杜云办公室总数量达到24家，结合金杜已有的28个实体办公室，形成了覆盖全球的52个线上线下结合的独特法律服务网络，借助创新模式和统一的高品质服务持续向更多客户提供有力支持。

这次发布的七个云办聚焦于中国西部及东南沿海地区。乌鲁木齐、呼和浩特、西宁、南宁、拉萨云办公室，将与已经发布的重庆、昆明、西安云办公室形成辐射整个西部地区的云办公室联动平台，结合金杜“一带一路”国际合作与促进中心的独特优势，为西部地区的经济发展注入活力，助力西部释放发展潜力。福州和厦门云办公室是金杜在福建省落脚的两个云办公室，金杜将立足福建本地、借助金杜在大湾区以及中国东部沿海积累的丰富的执业经验，为自贸试验区建设提供强有力的法律服务保障。

金杜全球主席王俊峰表示：“今年以来，金杜云办在组织发展、业务推进和平台建设等方面有了积极推进，我们不断摸索云科技成果在法律服务行业的转化和运用，并依托云办力量对事务所资源进行重新深挖整合，全面激活系统性内循环。第三批云办的上线，是金杜云办事业新的里程碑，亦将为更多年轻人职业发展提供新的契机，充分展现他们的创新活力和责任担当。”

第三批云办拉萨云办公室合伙人姜俊禄表示：“我们非常高兴第三批云办能够在2020年岁末正式上线，加入24家云办公室的大家庭。我们将汲取已发布云办在业务开发、团队建设等方面的宝贵经验，迅速铺开云办的服务网络，依托金杜‘云平台’，将金杜前沿的法律服务和丰富的全球平台资源拓展到这些地区，助推区域经济建设的步伐。”

段桃 白雪嵘 陈艺婧 合规业务部 金杜律师事务所

鉴于中国市场的规模及需求，很多大型跨国医药集团都在中国设立了研发中心、制药工厂或销售公司以开展业务经营。对于医药集团而言，无形资产已经成为其发展的核心动力，与无形资产相关的税务管理也受到了更多的关注。 Continue Reading 不畏“浮云”遮望眼——医药企业无形资产相关税务考量

Barri Mendelsohn London Office King & Wood Mallesons

Executive Summary

COVID-19 has resulted in many individuals and businesses making claims through the UK courts. With the courts having been closed from March to the end of June earlier this year and virtual hearings only just starting to be used, the pandemic has caused an unprecedented backlog in cases to be heard in the UK courts. Continue Reading Adding further particulars and claims relating to COVID to proceedings will not always been successful     

Barri Mendelsohn 伦敦办公室 金杜律师事务所

概述

新冠肺炎疫情导致许多个人和企业纷纷向英国法院提出自己的权利主张。由于法院在今年3月至6月底一直处于关闭状态，虚拟听证会又刚刚开始使用，于是英国法院出现了前所未有的案件积压。 Continue Reading 英国法在新冠肺炎疫情背景下的相关诉讼中提出额外的权利主张不一定会获得法院的支持

2020年12月11日，中国银行保险监督管理委员会（简称“银保监会”）批准招商银行与京东数科全资子公司——网银在线（北京）商务服务有限公司（简称“网银在线”）共同筹建招商拓扑银行股份有限公司（简称“招商拓扑银行”）。招商拓扑银行是自中信百信银行股份有限公司（简称“百信银行”）在2017年成立后，银保监会批准的中国境内第二家独立法人直销银行。 Continue Reading 招商银行获批筹建设立独立法人直销银行

On 19 December 2020, the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) and the Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) jointly released the “Measures for the Security Review of Foreign Investment (《外商投资安全审查办法》)” (the “Measures”)[1], which will become effective from 18 January 2021. The issuance of the Measures is a clear signal that the Chinese government is taking a more active approach in relation to national security review on foreign investments (“NSR”).
In this article, we will briefly explain the background of the promulgation of the Measures, introduce the main contents from both substantive and procedural perspectives as well as discuss the potential impacts upon future foreign investments in China.

Background for Promulgation of the Measures

According to the NDRC’s spokesperson, the Measures were promulgated against the following background:[2]

  • Based on 10 years of experience in national security reviews (“NSR”) in China: Back in February 2011, the General Office of the State Council issued the Notice on Establishment of Security Review System Pertaining to Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (《国务院办公厅关于建立外国投资者并购境内企业安全审查制度的通知》) (the “Notice”) . This marked the genesis of China’s NSR regime.[3] Although few cases of NSR have been made public, the Chinese authorities have accumulated experience in conducting NSR in the last 10 years.
  • Fleshing out requirements set out in the Foreign Investment Law: The Foreign Investment Law of the PRC[4] (《中华人民共和国外商投资法》) , which became effective on 1 January 2020 set in place formally that the NSR would become a feature of China’s foreign investment regulatory regime. Since then, foreign investors and other interested parties have been awaiting details as to how NSR will be implemented in practice.
  • Responding to recent developments of NSR in other major jurisdictions: In recent years, major jurisdictions, including the U.S., European Union, India, Australia, Germany, Japan and UK, have either enacted or further expanded the scope of their existing NSR related laws. COVID-19 has also greatly heightened both economic and security concerns on the part of governments around the world. The promulgation of the Measures is also a response by China to the fast changing regulatory landscape worldwide.

Main Contents of the Measures

The Measures consists of 23 Articles detailing:

(1) Review Authority of NSR

According to the Measures, the State will establish a working mechanism office (工作机制办公室)(the “NSR Office”) which shall be responsible for organizing, coordinating and guiding NSR in respect of foreign investments. The NSR Office will be set up under and led by NDRC whereas NDRC and MOFCOM jointly undertake routine NSR work.[5]

KWM Comments:

Based on our experiences, NDRC and MOFCOM may also consult with competent industry regulators that are relevant to specific transactions. These may include, amongst others, the Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the People’s Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission etc. In such cases, NDRC and MOFCOM are likely to carry out the NSR review in conjunction with the relevant regulators.

(2) Scope of Transactions Covered by the NSR

The Measures provide that the following types of transactions will fall within the scope of the NSR:

(a) any foreign investment in a new project or establishment of new enterprise in China alone or jointly with other investors;

(b) any foreign investor’s acquisition of equity or assets of a domestic enterprise through merger or acquisition; or

(c) any foreign investment in China through any other measure. [6]

KWM Comments:

(1) Compared with the rules set out by the Notice and the Security Review Provision (together the “Previous Rules”), the Measures expanded the types of transactions falling within the scope of NSR. Under the Previous Rules, acquisition of domestic enterprises by foreign investors are subject to NSR if the transaction impacts national security. The Measures are broader and apply to all foreign investments in China, whether directly or indirectly and regardless as to whether the target is a foreign-invested-enterprise (“FIE”) or domestic enterprise. It should also be noted that the scope is not limited to M&A transactions, but will also apply to green-field projects.

(2) The Measures have a catch all provision “foreign investments in China through other measures”. The Previous Rules provide that foreign investors shall not evade the NSR by means of nominal shareholders, trust, multiple-layer investment, lease, loan, control agreement, offshore transactions, etc. We understand that a similar approach may be taken under the Measures, e.g. control by agreement / variable interest entity (“VIE”) structure or reinvestment through a foreign invested enterprise would fall within the scope of NSR.

(3) Industry Sectors Covered by the NSR

The Measures separate industry sectors caught within the NSR into two categories:

1st Category

Any foreign investment will be subject to NSR (regardless control or not)

2nd Category

Investments resulting in the target being foreign controlled will be subject to NSR
Sectors included

Military industry

Military industrial supporting facilities or other fields relating to the security of national defence;

Investments in areas surrounding military facilities and military industry facilities.

 

Critical agricultural products;

Critical energy and resources;

Critical equipment manufacturing;

Critical infrastructure;

Critical transport services;

Critical cultural products and services;

Critical information technology and Internet products and services;

Critical financial services;

Critical technologies;

Other critical fields relating to national security.

 

KWM Comments:

(1) In addition to the industry sectors covered by the Previous Rules, the Measures add the following new areas to the NSR’s scope: critical information technology and Internet products and services, critical financial services and critical cultural products and services. However, the Measures do not set out a clear definition of these sectors and thus, as is typically the case, leave a wide discretion to the regulators in interpreting their scope.

(2) The assessment whether a target will be “controlled” by foreign investors will rest on the following “actual control” standards: (a) if the foreign investor holds more than 50% equity in the target; or (b) if the foreign investor holds less than 50% equity but exercises significant impact in the board of directors, board of shareholders or general meeting of shareholder by means of voting rights; or (c) other circumstances where the foreign investor may have a significant impact on the target’s business decision-making, human resources, finance, technology etc. This seems to be even wider than the control standards under China’s merger control regime.

(4) Initiation of the NSR and the Reviewing Procedure

The NSR Office can accept filings by the parties, but can also initiate requests to the parties to make a filing if the NSR Office considers the transaction falls within the NSR scope.

Parties cannot close a transaction during the review procedure.[7] In the event the transaction has been closed before a review decision is made, the NSR Office has authority to unwind the transaction or order divestment. [8] It is noteworthy that, there is no time limit for the Office to investigate or prohibit the transaction if it has impacts to the national security.

After receiving the application from the parties, the NSR Office has 15 working days to decide whether the transaction is subject to NSR. If the transaction is subject to NSR, the NSR Office will have 30 working days under the general procedure, and further 60 working days (with a possible extension) under the special procedure. For the detailed procedure, please see below the flowchart.

KWM Comments:

The procedure rules in the Measures substantially follow the rules that are currently in place. In practice, for transactions with national security concerns, the review time can be much longer, as the time spent by the parties in preparing supplemental submissions or in amending the investment plan is not counted.

Compared with Previous Rules, the Measures introduce new mechanisms such as a pre-filing consultation mechanism (Article 5), whistle-blower mechanism (Article 15) and joint disciplinary mechanism (Article 19). These new mechanisms show the Chinese authorities are stepping up efforts in NSR enforcement.

(5) Possible outcomes of NSR decisions

The Measures provide the following outcomes for NSR decisions:

  • Approval: If proposed foreign investment does not impact national security, then the transaction will pass the NSR.
  • Prohibition: If the proposed foreign investment is considered to have an impact on national security, then the NSR Office may prohibit the investment.
  • Approval with conditions attached: If the NSR Office considers that an impact to national security could be eliminated by attaching conditions, then the parties may commit in writing to accept such conditions and the NSR Office may conditionally approve the transaction.

KWM Comments:

At present there is no public precedent of a conditional NSR approval in China. It remains to be seen how NDRC and MOFCOM will impose conditional approvals in practice. However, considering the legal enforcement in similar fields in China (e.g. for merger control review from an antitrust perspective) and the practice of NSR regime in other major jurisdictions, we expect likely conditions may include the following:

  • Structural conditions such as divestitures of core technology, IP, data, or key contracts/assets related to supplying the government or key Chinese customers. In extreme circumstances there may be an order to divest all or part of the China business.
  • Behavioral conditions such as restrictions on access to key technology or data or transmission of data overseas; appointing a Chinese based trustee to handle certain products/services and ensuring that relevant business activities are carried out in China; appointment of a Chinese government-approved security officer to ensure compliance.

Impacts on Foreign Investments to China:

The Measures pledge any further foreign investments that may impact national security will be subject to greater scrutiny by Chinese authorities. This echoes the global movement towards adopting more stringent review regimes. However, it is worth noting that the Measures are actually far less onerous than regimes in many other jurisdictions. Not only is the list of affected sectors more narrowly defined, but the control standard to be met for most of the investments falling within the NSR scope is also relatively high in comparison with regimes in other jurisdictions. Accordingly, for the vast majority of the foreign investments in China, the direct impact upon such foreign investments would likely be modest.

But for players whose business are relevant to the affected areas, NSR will no doubt add complexity to doing transactions in China, by not only impacting the deal timeline, but also giving rise to uncertainty in deal closing and potential conditions to be imposed. The recent popular sectors for investments such as technology, internet, and financial services may well be captured by the expanded scope of the Measures. Given the broad-brush approach of the Measures and the NSR Office’s wide discretion, investors are well advised to conduct a thorough NSR assessment for transactions and ensure compliance with NSR filings.

Xu Ping, Liu Cheng, Mark, Li Yumeng, Corporate & Commercial Group, King & Wood Mallesons

 

 

 

 

We’d like to thank Torres Nicholas Louis (Nick) and Ye Hongtao for their contribution for this article.

[1] Measure for the Security Review of Foreign Investment (《外商投资安全审查办法》) (Decree No.37 of the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce) promulgated by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce on 19 December 2020.

[2] See Completing the Security Review of Foreign Investment to Protect a Higher Level of Opening-up – Answering Reporters’ Question regarding the Measures on Security Review of Foreign Investment by the Head of the Office of Foreign Investment Security Review (《健全外商投资安全审查制度 为更高水平对外开放保驾护航——外商投资安全审查工作机制办公室负责人就<外商投资安全审查办法>答记者问》), https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwdt/xwfb/202012/t20201219_1255024.html

[3] After that, MOFCOM issued the Provisions on Implementation of Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (《商务部实施外国投资者并购境内企业安全审查制度的规定》) (“Security Review Rules”) which provided more detailed procedural rules for NSR. These rules basically set up the legal framework of China’s NSR regime.

[4] Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China (《中华人民共和国外商投资法》) (Presidential decree No.26) promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress

[5] See Article 3 of the Measures.

[6] See Article 2 of the Measures

[7] See Article 8 of the Measures.

[8] See Article 12 of the Measures.

叶永青，马晓煜，宋丹丹 合规业务部 金杜律师事务所

一、前言

近年来，共享经济对传统的企业用工模式和薪酬福利管理都带来了巨大挑战。在疫情影响的经济下行期，员工福利平台和拥有委托代征资质的灵活用工平台因为能够解决企业和员工的诸多痛点而备受青睐。两类平台虽在具体业务模式等方面存在较大的差异，但站在税收和企业成本管理的角度，都主要是因为在个人所得税和企业社保支出上能够提供一定的灵活安排而被大量的采用。 Continue Reading 税务和刑事合规监管下的员工福利和灵活用工平台，路在何方？