互联网金融作为与传统金融行业迥异的依托于互联网高科技平台的创新实践，近些年来发展势头迅猛，引发了大量投资者对于众筹、P2P网络借贷等新型投资方式的关注。互联网金融的蓬勃发展，不仅为我国中小企业开辟了诸多新型融资渠道，也为大众提供了丰富的融资选择，对于社会与实体经济起到了促进作用。但同时，因为国家尚未对其架构起系统化的监管体系，相关立法与制度不够完善，该行业亦在粗放式的发展状态中产生了诸多风险。证监会近日发布《关于对通过互联网开展股权融资活动的机构进行专项检查的通知》（下文简称《通知》），即是国家对于股权众筹融资行业发展不规范行为进行的一次整顿，本文主要结合该《通知》，针对股权众筹融资进行相应法律问题分析。
股权众筹融资主要是指通过互联网形式进行公开小额股权融资的活动，相比于不久前十部委发布的《指导意见》，证监会《通知》中对于股权众筹融资行为进行了更为详细的解释，即创新创业者或小微企业通过股权众筹融资中介机构互联网平台公开募集股本的活动。
全文阅读，请点击此处。
By King & Wood Mallesons
August, 2015, Ms. You Yang, King & Wood Mallesons’ (“KWM”) dispute resolution and litigation partner, was ranked among the 2015 Client Choice Top 20 Lawyers in China by Asian Legal Business (ALB). The award, which is based on clients’ feedback, recognizes Ms. Yang’s expertise as well as her ongoing focus on delivering high quality service to her clients. Continue Reading King & Wood Mallesons’ You Yang ranked as a Top 20 Lawyer in China
作者：金杜律师事务所
2015年8月，《亚洲法律杂志》公布了2015年度“中国客户首选律师20强”榜单，金杜律师事务所（简称“金杜”）争议解决与诉讼业务合伙人尤杨律师凭借备受客户赞誉的专业能力和广泛认可度跻身其中。此次尤杨律师当选“中国客户首选律师20强”，充分印证了客户对尤杨律师本人和金杜律师事务所的肯定和认可。 Continue Reading 金杜合伙人尤杨律师荣登《亚洲法律杂志》“中国客户首选律师20强”榜单
长期以来，建设单位、发包人拖欠建筑施工企业工程款的问题，一直都是建设工程领域的痼疾，已成为司法实践中高发的纠纷案类。《合同法》第286条及最高人民法院于2002年6月20日作出《关于建设工程价款优先受偿权问题的批复》，赋予建设工程承包人工程价款优先受偿权，成为施工单位及时收回拖欠工程价款的有利保障。然而，由于实践中出现的问题复杂多样，上述规定较为原则，因此，司法实践中对于建设工程价款优先受偿权的具体适用上仍存在较多分歧。
下文拟结合我们实际办理过的代表性案例，对分包人或实际施工人能否享有建设工程价款优先受偿权这一实践中存在争议的问题进行探讨。
全文阅读，请点击此。
2015年8月24日，第十二届全国人大常委会第十六次会议召开。这次的常委会审议九项法律案，其中备受社会关注的《中华人民共和国大气污染防治法》（以下简称“大气污染防治法”或“修订草案”）进行第三次审议，如果大气污染防治法在这次的常委会审议通过，将于2016年1月1日实施。
这是既环保法之后，第一部修订的环保单项法律，也是环保法之后非常重要的一部环保法律修订。环保法所确立的理念、原则能否在大气污染防治法中具体体现，也构成了对环保法作为环保基础性法律的检验。
鉴于此，对大气污染防治法三审稿即修订草案提出如下修改建议： Continue Reading 对大气污染防治法三审修订的八点建议
By Huang Jianwen King&Wood Mallesons’ Investment Group
The National Health and Family Planning Commission (the “NHFPC”) and the China Food and Drug Administration (the “CFDA”) recently jointly published the Administration Measures for the Research (for Trial Implementation) (the “Administration Measures”), which became effective on 20 July 2015.
The Administration Measures state that the Research (the “Research”) must comply with the principles of science, standardization, openness, ethics, and sufficient protection of the rights of research subjects. The Administration Measures also stipulate the qualifications and duties of the Research institutions, the review and record filing mechanism of the Research projects, the regulatory measures for the Research, and the protection of the rights of the Research subjects. Meanwhile, upon the promulgation of the Administration Measures, technologies related to stem cell treatment will no longer be regulated as class III medical technologies. It is worth noticing that Research accomplished under the Administration Measures cannot directly enter into clinical application.
Read full article, please click here.
By Xu xiaodan and Pei xiu King&Wood Mallesons’ Labor Group
A company’s HR department is sometimes faced with such situation that the business unit (“BU”) needs to be internally adjusted and thus the HR needs to help dismissing certain employees in a particular BU. However, it always causes troubles if the employment contract of the concerned employee is yet to expire, or this employee has never committed any gross misconduct or is found incompetent for his/her work. In such a circumstance, if this employee does not consent on mutual termination, what ground can the HR personnel use to terminate the employment contract? Continue Reading Panacea for Employment Termination: Brief Analysis on Application of “A Significant Change Has Occurred in the Objective Circumstance”
企业的人力资源部门有时会遇到这种情况：业务部门要做内部调整，于是公司告知人力，需要解聘该部门的某某。如果这名员工的劳动合同尚未到期，也没有严重违纪或不胜任工作的情形，企业人力就该头疼了——如果这名员工不同意协商解除，我应该用什么理由与这名员工解除劳动合同呢?
这时候，有些人力资源人员会将《劳动合同法》第四十条第三项规定的“客观情况发生重大变化”当作万金油，据此单方解除员工的劳动合同。那么，在现有的法律框架下，这一解除理由是否真的那么好用呢? Continue Reading 解除员工的万金油?——浅析“客观情况发生重大变化”的适用条件
By Lucy Lu and Ding Wu King&Wood Mallesons’ Labor Group
Recently, the Standing Committee of People’s Congress of Shanghai has approved the Amendment to Shanghai Collective Agreement Regulation (the “Amendment”), which shall become effective on 1 October 2015. This Amendment further improves the clauses regarding the scope for collective negotiation of salary, emphasizes on the effect of superior trade union in the collective negotiation, and stipulates certain punishment on enterprises that refuse to conduct the collective negotiation. Continue Reading The Interpretation of Amendment to Shanghai Collective Agreement Regulation
