第三部分 建议篇
二、 仲裁案件管理
2. 工作风格
在境外仲裁程序中，仲裁当事人的工作风格，可能会对仲裁结果产生重大影响。中方当事人的工作风格，有时与境外仲裁程序的惯常要求不相适应。
首先，中方当事人向本方律师陈述事实时，喜欢避重就轻，只报喜不报忧，希望给律师“灌输”事实，而不是客观陈述事实。
其次，在书面证据披露上，一些中方当事人过于保守，不愿意提供任何技术文件。
再次，中方当事人“激情”过多，“理性”较少，容易陷入与外国申请人在程序上的“缠斗”。 Continue Reading “保密协议”争议境外仲裁的法律与实务（十九）
第三部分 建议篇
二、仲裁案件管理
1. 工作团队
在“保密协议”争议境外仲裁中，中方工作团队通常由三部分组成。
第一部分是企业为仲裁案件专门成立的“专案组”。专案组成员通常包括：经企业正式授权，负责案件答辩工作的企业领导（一至两人）；企业法律顾问（一至三人）；了解案件事实情况的工程师（一般三至五人）。 Continue Reading “保密协议”争议境外仲裁的法律与实务（十八）
By King & Wood Mallesons’ Compliance Group
Recently, allegations of a massive bribery scheme on the part of the Chinese unit of a famous British multinational pharmaceutical company have grabbed headlines in China and abroad. China’s Ministry of Public Security officially announced on July 11 that senior executives of this company are under criminal investigation on suspicion of using travel agencies to bribe government officials, hospitals, doctors, and medical industry associations in a scheme to increase sales. Some of the company’s senior executives and employees are also suspected of taking bribes from third party vendors. Continue Reading COMPLIANCE-Watchword of Healthcare Companies and Possible Other Companies in China
作者：金杜律师事务所法律合规组
在过去的几个星期，中国政府部门对一家著名的英国跨国药企采取的一系列行动不断登上了国内和国际媒体的头版头条。中国公安部于7月11日正式宣布，该公司的部分高级管理人员涉嫌为增加产品销量，而通过旅行社向政府官员、医院、医生和医疗行业协会等大肆行贿，目前已对相关人员展开刑事侦查。另外，该声明还指出该公司的一些高管及员工同时涉嫌收受供应商的商业贿赂。 Continue Reading 合规：在华医疗企业和其他高风险企业关注的问题
by King & Wood Mallesons’ Compliance Group
On July 2, the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) announced that it is investigating costs and prices charged by 60 foreign and domestic drug makers. Concerned pharmaceutical manufacturers should be aware that the investigation process imposes certain rights and obligations on the manufacturers and the investigating authorities alike. Continue Reading China’s Investigation into Drug Pricing: What You Need to Know
作者：金杜律师事务所法律合规组
7月2日，国家发展和改革委员会宣布将对60家本国和跨国医药企业展开药品成本价调查。对此，相关医药企业有必要对政府和企业在价格调查过程中的相关权利和义务进行了解。 Continue Reading 面对中国政府的药品价格调查应当了解的事情
By Susan Ning, Hazel Yin and Dasha Xiao
Today (July 29), the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (“SAIC“) held a press conference announcing that it has launched a publication platform for antitrust enforcement decisions. The final penalty decisions of all cases that have been closed (a total of 12) are published on SAIC’s website. Ms. Ren Airong, Director General of the Antimonopoly and Anti-unfair Competition Enforcement Bureau of SAIC also mentioned the plan to promulgate the guideline and the regulation concerning IP-related antitrust issues. Continue Reading China’s State Administration for Industry and Commerce Publishes All Antitrust Enforcement Decisions It Made Thus Far
By Susan Ning, Hazel Yin, and Han Wu
On July 17th, People’s Daily reported that the Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission is investigating gold retailers including but not limited to Shanghai Lao Feng Xiang (600612. SH) and Yuyuan Tourist Mart Company (600655.SH) for manipulation of gold jewelry retail price in Shanghai under the auspices of the Shanghai Gold & Jewelry Trade Association (“SGJTA”). Continue Reading NDRC Probes Shanghai Gold Association and Gold Retailers for Price Fixing
By King&Wood Mallesons’ Trademark Group
Zhoushan City Aquatic Product Alliance initiated a civil action against Beijing Shenmaren Food Sales Co. (“Shenmaren”), on the grounds that “ Zhoushan Jingxuan Daiyu” produced by Shenmaren with the indication of “ZHOUSHANDAIYU” prominently printed on the package would likely mislead the public and infringe upon the exclusive right of Zhoushan City Aquatic Product Alliance to use the mark. Zhoushan City Aquatic Product Alliance requested Shenmaren to cease the infringement and compensate for their losses. Continue Reading First Certification Mark Case–“ZHOUSHANDAIYU and device”
作者：金杜律师事务所商标组
舟山市水产流通与加工行业协会（简称舟山水产协会）系第5020381号证明商标“舟山带鱼ZHOUSHANDAIYU及图”的专用权人。舟山水产协会以申马人公司生产的“舟山精选带鱼段”，其外包装上突出使用了“舟山带鱼”字样，容易造成公众混淆，从而侵犯其商标专用权为由提起民事诉讼，请求对方立即停止生产销售侵权产品并赔偿经济损失。 Continue Reading “舟山带鱼”证明商标案——首例证明商标案例
