作者:姜俊禄 张洪源 金杜律师事务所商务合规部
根
据《企业职工患病或非因工负伤医疗期规定》(“《规定》”)第三条的规定,企业职工因患病或非因工负伤,需要停止工作进行医疗时,企业应当根据职工实际参加工作年限和在本单位工作年限,给予职工三个月到二十四个月的医疗期。但是对于患有特殊疾病(如癌症、精神病、瘫痪等)的职工,根据《劳动部关于贯彻<企业职工患病或非因工负伤医疗期规定>的通知》(“《通知》”)第二条,如果在24个月内尚不能痊愈的,经企业和劳动主管部门批准,可以适当延长医疗期。实践当中,因为此条规定并没有明确职工一旦患有特殊疾病是否即能在不判断工作年限的情况下自动适用24个月的医疗期,一些意见相左的案例相继出现。
我们据此对北京、上海和深圳三地的案例进行了检索,请看以下案例中三地法院对该问题的态度及裁判要点。
全文阅读,请点击此处。




We have spoken to a lot of our clients and we didn’t really hear that they thought leaving the EU would lead to less regulation as far as their sectors are concerned. If you look at the competition side, you’re really looking at a fairly global system of enforcement these days, so I don’t think that there would be significant changes in the way competition law is enforced in the UK at a general level. But, of course, there are interesting developments if you look a little bit more at the detail.
015年12月24日,最高人民法院在《关于当前商事审判工作中的若干具体问题》中明确,“根据立案登记司法解释规定,因虚假陈述、内幕交易和市场操纵行为引发的民事赔偿案件,立案受理时不再以监管部门的行政处罚和生效的刑事判决认定为前置条件”。