作者:胡喆 陈府申 金杜律师事务所金融资本部
互联网金融已经不知不觉进入了每一个人的日常生活, 在此背景下, 在日常的法律实践操作中, 许多我们习以为常操作方式亦在悄然发生改变, 具备互联网属性的操作方式正在渐渐成为主流, 而电子合同的不断普及即是一个明证。有鉴于电子合同在互联网金融行业得到越来越多的应用, 我们采用图文并茂的方式针对互联网金融领域中涉及的电子合同法律问题进行了以下梳理。
全文阅读,请点击此处。
作者:James McKenzie Daisy Mallett 金杜律师事务所
解析《中澳自由贸易协定》中的ISDS条款:空头承诺抑或是对ISDS批评者的答复?
《中澳自由贸易协定》(ChAFTA)已经尘埃落定。中国和澳大利亚两国政府于2015年6月17日签订了这个具有里程碑意义的协定,但该协定仍需在两国完成必要批准程序之后才能生效。
该协定将大幅度放宽市场准入,并加深两国经济关系(更不用说澳大利亚政府和肉制品生产商希望通过此协定推动牛肉制品的大量出口了)。随着贸易与投资的增加,不可避免地会产生更多纠纷。本文主要讨论该协定中的投资者与东道国争端解决(ISDS)机制,该机制在协定中所占篇幅不长,却引起了媒体的广泛关注和争论。
本文将详细阐述ChAFTA中ISDS条款的起草过程及范围,并就该机制可能对中澳两国政府及各自投资者产生的影响提出我们的观点。
全文阅读,请点击此处。
By James McKenzie and Daisy Mallett, King & Wood Mallesons
A guide to ISDS in the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A hollow promise or an answer to ISDS’ critics?
The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) is here. The landmark agreement was signed between the governments of Australia and China on 17 June 2015, although it will only take force once it hurdles the necessary ratification processes in both countries.
Read full article, please click here.
By Xu Xiaodan and Qi Yiduo King & Wood Mallesons’ Commerical & Regulatory Group
Answers to Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases (III) (the “Answers to Labor Dispute Issues (III)”),issued by the First Tribunal of Zhejiang People’s High Court and Zhejiang Labor Dispute Arbitration Committee on 29 September 2015, have clarified several issues with respect to the application of law for the labor dispute cases in Zhejiang province. Issues that are worthy of attention by employers in Zhejiang are as follows:
Read full article, please click here.
作者:徐萍 肖马克 和Christian Cornett 金杜律师事务所


德国企业正越来越引起中国投资者的兴趣,其中大部分的中国投资者是战略投资者。对德国企业而言,这类投资者在企业战略方面有着较高的价值,是优秀的投资者。对中国投资者而言有步骤分阶段地进入目标企业便是个可取的策略。
在企业出售,收购或者在分阶段对目标企业进行收购后交易双方合作等方面取得成功的关键在于:理解德国卖方和中国买方存在的不同利益,并促使双方的利益一致化。因为在这类交易中没有事先设计好的所谓蓝图,中西方世界在文化上的相互理解对交易成功就至关重要。 Continue Reading 收购德国企业的双赢战略
By Raymond Wong Tony Dong King & Wood Mallesons

Transfer pricing is a term used to define the price charged between associated enterprises for the transfer of goods, services and intangible property. Increasing cross-border activities have made transfer pricing a real issue as enterprises seek to use transfer pricing as a tool for tax avoidance. Consequently, HK has increased the awareness of transfer pricing and placed specific emphasis towards the development of rules and regulations in order to combat multinational tax avoidance and evasion through transfer pricing. Understanding HK’s position on transfer pricing becomes increasingly important because, as rules and regulations develop, this also inadvertently influences the relationship and supply chain of an enterprise and its intra-group transactions.
Read full article, please click here.