By King and Wood Mallesons

On January 28, 2020, the China National Intellectual Property Administration(CNIPA) issued a notice named the Matters Concerning the Term of Patents, Trademarks, and Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits Affected by the Epidemic, which announced that if the parties had delayed the time limit stipulated in the Trademark Law and its implementing regulations or specified by the CNIPA for epidemic-related reasons, the relevant time limit will be suspended from the day when the obstacle to the exercise of rights occurred, and it will continue to be calculated until the day when the obstacle to the exercise of rights is eliminated, except as otherwise provided by law. If the trademark right is lost due to the obstacle to the exercise of rights, a written application should be filed within 2 months from the date when the obstacle to the exercise of rights is eliminated, the reason shall be given, and the corresponding certification materials shall be filed to request the recovery of the rights. Continue Reading CNIPA’s Handling of Trademark Enforcement Obstacles in the New Coronavirus Epidemic

作者:龚牧龙、万敏秀 金杜律师事务所

随着中国证券投资基金业协会(“基金业协会”)2019年发布的《私募投资基金备案须知》(《备案须知》)规定的过渡期安排将于2020年3月31日到期,为提高《备案须知》适用后私募投资基金备案工作的公开透明度和备案效率,基金业协会于2020年3月20日公布了私募投资基金备案申请材料清单(《备案清单》,具体内容请见后附)。 Continue Reading 私募投资基金备案申请材料清单发布,标准化和透明度再升级

By King and Wood Mallesons

On February 18, 2020, the Trademark Office(TM office) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) issued a notice named Online Publication of the Decisions on Trademark Oppositions. TM office announced in the notice as following: To enhance the transparency of the trademark opposition examination, strengthen social supervision, promote law-based administration, we decide to publish decisions on the trademark oppositions online. The decisions will be published on the China National Trademark website (http://sbj.cnipa.gov.cn/) within 20 working days after delivered, except where any of the following circumstances: Continue Reading CINIPA started to publish the trademark opposition decisions online

作者:金杜律师事务所

2020年1月28日,国家知识产权局发出一则关于专利、商标、集成电路布图设计受疫情影响相关期限事项的公告(第350号),该公告指出当事人因疫情相关原因延误商标法及其实施条例规定的期限或者国家知识产权局指定的期限,导致其不能正常办理相关商标事务的,相关期限自权利行使障碍产生之日起中止,待权利行使障碍消除之日继续计算,法律另有规定的除外;因权利行使障碍导致其商标权利丧失的,可以自权利行使障碍消除之日起2个月内提出书面申请,说明理由,出具相应的证明材料,请求恢复权利。 Continue Reading 国家知识产权局针对新型冠状病毒疫情中商标行权障碍的处理

作者:景云峰、张波、蒋睿馨 金杜律师事务所

平时一提到关务合规或者海关行政处罚、走私犯罪,很多外贸企业关注的焦点往往集中在进口环节。与此同时,存在重大合规风险的货物出口环节经常被忽视,甚至部分企业还长期持有误解,认为海关只管进口不管出口。本文旨在通过列举典型违法犯罪案例,重点解读出口法律风险,以帮助外贸企业及时填补合规监管漏洞。

Continue Reading 不可小觑的出口法律风险

作者:金杜律师事务所

2020年2月18日,国家知识产权局商标局发出关于在“网上公开商标异议决定文书的公告”。公告称:为增强商标异议审查工作的透明度,加强社会监督,促进依法行政,我局决定自2020年1月1日起在网上公开商标异议决定,商标异议决定文书将自交邮之日起20个工作日内在中国商标网(http://sbj.cnipa.gov.cn/)上予以公开,但有下列情形之一的除外: Continue Reading 商标局开始在网上公开异议决定书

By Xu Jing, Ye Wanli, Liu Xinyu, King and wood Mallesons

On December 30, 2019, Guangzhou Tianhe District People’s Court issued a judgment granting trade dress protection for two iconic handbag series designed and sold by a famous luxury good company1. The distinctiveness determination test in this case is particularly helpful to luxury brands for protecting iconic styles or product series that normally include generic design elements that have been widely used by the industry. Continue Reading PRC Courts Grant Trade Dress Protection for Handbags which Overall Appearance is a Combination of Generic Design Elements

作者:宁宣凤 吴涵 李沅珊 潘驰 张乐健 金杜律师事务所

近年来,人工智能应用逐渐落地,其中尤以人脸识别最为典型[1]。新技术固然给日常生活带来了种种便利,但因为人脸包含生物识别特征的特殊属性,相关争议从未停止[2]。在瑞典,一所中学因使用人脸识别系统被认定违反《通用数据保护条例》,收到瑞典数据保护机构的首张罚单;在美国,伊利诺伊州的一起集体诉讼案中Fb被指控滥用人脸图像数据,最终不得不支付5.5亿美元的隐私和解金[3];在我国,人脸识别技术在金融等领域已有广泛应用,但人脸信息的滥用、泄露和安全问题也层出不穷[4]Continue Reading “人面不知何处去”——人脸数据采集及使用的权利边界

作者:马峰 于幸 赵倍民 金杜律师事务所

3月10日国务院常务会议指出:“越是遇到困难,就越是要扩大改革开放。”持续的疫情没有令改革的步伐放缓,仅仅近一周内,在跨境本外币业务管理方面就出台一系列通知、方案及试点政策,改革开放正在加快步伐。 Continue Reading 跨境本外币业务政策梳理及解析

作者:梁燕玲 王召刚 金杜律师事务所

2019年12月26日,最高人民法院公布了修改后的《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(下称“《证据规定》”)。修改后的《证据规定》将于2020年5月1日起施行。

新的《证据规定》列举了电子数据证据的范围,并规定了电子数据证据真实性的审查因素。本文旨在结合《证据规定》的具体条文以及司法实践中“区块链存证第一案”,具体探讨实践中如何认定电子数据真实性以及区块链技术是否可以有效证明电子数据的真实性。 Continue Reading 或能够打败网上“老赖”的终极“武功秘籍”:区块链技术