作者:冯晓鹏 马聪 金杜律师事务所合规业务部

近年来,我国跨境电商市场交易规模迅速上升,特别是自2019年《电子商务法》的出台与跨境电商零售进口新政正式实施以来,跨境电商领域健康有序,蓬勃发展,成为我国经济新增长点。但不可忽视的是,作为新业态,跨境电商的经营模式仍在推陈出新、不断创新中,行业迅猛发展的同时也滋生了许多以伪报贸易方式、低报价格方式为主的走私犯罪。在此形势下,如何对跨境电商走私犯罪做到一分为二的看待,对社会危害性大、主观恶性深、影响恶劣的走私犯罪严厉打击,对社会危害性小、积极合规整改的企业予以引导和扶持,贯彻落实最高检平等保护民营企业,少捕慎诉的精神,是我们需要思考和解决的问题。检察机关目前试行的“合规不起诉”制度为解决此问题提供了思路。

Continue Reading 跨境电商走私犯罪法律分析及其合规不起诉的实现进路

Written by: Sandra Link, Mark Schaub KWM overseas office

What is GSCA?

GSCA requires German companies to analyze and report compliance with certain human rights and environmental standards along their supply chain.

GSCA does not intend to implement German social standards world-wide but aims to ensure compliance within the supply chain with minimum international standards (i.e. no child labor or forced labor or meeting basic environmental protection requirements). Continue Reading German Supply Chain Act (GSCA) – Implications for Chinese companies

作者:陈博志 邬素岚 吴嘉骏 香港&澳大利亚办公室 金杜律师事务所

近期的虚拟资产行业制度化浪潮使得一类特殊的监管变得尤为重要——证券交易所上市规则。许多上市公司均有意透过直接持有虚拟资产或透过投资区块链行业接触虚拟资产。

于香港上市的公司(“香港上市公司”)在投资于虚拟资产或冒险从事虚拟资产相关业务活动时需要遵守哪些规定?此外,对于主营业务涉及虚拟资产的新上市申请人有哪些上市要求?

在本文中,我们将探讨香港特别行政区对香港上市公司和潜在上市申请人的一些关键要求,重点关注以下关键领域:

  1. 活动是否属于“日常业务”
  2. 披露规则
  3. 投资政策及管治
  4. 香港首次公开招股 (新上市)

Continue Reading 香港上市公司从事虚拟资产行业业务需要了解的关键事项

Authors: Huang Jianwen, Zhang Yu, Regulatory & Compliance Group, King & Wood Mallesons

Medical devices are related to the life and health of the people and the overall situation of the country’s social development. With the rapid development of China’s medical device industry, Regulations on Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices, as the “Basic Law” of the industry’s supervision, has undergone two amendments in 2014 and 2017 since its promulgation in 2000. On October 8, 2017, the General Office of the Central Committee of the CPC and the General Office of the State Council issued the Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Evaluation and Approval System and Encouraging Innovations in Drugs and Medical Devices (the “Opinions on Deepening the Reform and Encouraging Innovations”), which put forward new requirements for deepening the reform of evaluation and approval system of medical devices. In order to adapt the rapid development of the medical device industry and the further reform of the regulatory system of industry, the newly revised Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices (the “New Regulations”) was adopted by the Decree of State Council (No. 739) and signed by the Premier of the State Council on February 9, 2021. The New Regulations have been implemented since June 1, 2021.

Compared with Regulations on Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices (2017 Amendment) (the “2017 Edition of the Regulations”), the New Regulations pay more attention to promoting the innovative development of the medical device industry, and simultaneously focus on the quality and safety of medical device products.  Through the study of the New Regulations, we understand that the New Regulations are mainly amended in the following five aspects: (1) establishing a system of medical device registrant and filing applicant to promote the full implementation of the system of market authorization holders and to consolidate the responsibilities of enterprises; (2) consolidating the achievement of the reform and comprehensively optimize the approval and record-filing procedures; (3) encouraging innovation of medical devices and treating the innovation of medical devices as the focus of development; (4) clarifying the regulatory requirements for hot issues such as online distributions of medical devices; (5) adjusting the legal liabilities to increase the number of penalty circumstances and increase the penalty for illegal acts.

This article will interpret the main contents and the highlights of the amendment of the New Regulations, and analyze the changes in China’s medical device regulatory system under the New Regulations and its impact on the industry development. Continue Reading Optimizing Supervision System and Promoting Industrial Development – Interpretation of Key Points of Regulations on Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices (2021 Amendment)

作者:吴巍 张双 金杜律师事务所争议解决部

自最高检启动涉案企业合规考察试点以来,金杜律师事务所密切关注并有幸以不同角色参与到各地试点工作中。通过总结试点办案经验,我们认为,对于涉案企业来说,开展合规自查,调查并分析违法行为发生的原因、企业合规管控的漏洞,是十分必要的。企业只有识别出违法行为背后的管控漏洞,才能明确合规整改的重点和方向。而企业开展合规自查的情况,也体现了其合规整改的意愿和基础。因此,我们建议将合规自查作为检察院决定是否对企业适用考察机制的考量因素之一,让合规自查成为涉案企业的 “必选动作”。

Continue Reading 涉案企业合规考察实务案例分享之二:合规自查应成为涉案企业的 “必选动作”(上)

作者:刘迎 谷雨禾 向高洁 金杜律师事务所知识产权部

今日,东京奥运会正式开幕。即便新冠疫情为这次奥运会带来众多变数,但奥运会所传递的精神、奥运健儿的优异表现仍然非常值得我们期待。作为全世界最受瞩目的体育盛宴,奥运会吸引着全球观众的目光。本次奥运会受疫情影响,成为了一届没有现场观众的奥运会,赛事的传播将更多的依赖于赛事的转播方及相关新闻媒体。观赛观众能够坐在沙发上就享受着直击现场和追踪热点的体验,离不开媒体机构活跃在奥运赛场内外进行奥运转播和赛事报道。纵观奥运的百年发展史,媒体机构为奥林匹克价值的传播与推广作出了不可磨灭的贡献。本次奥运法律专题我们就来谈谈媒体转播与赛事报道那些事儿。 Continue Reading 奥运法律专题丨奥运媒体转播权与奥运赛事报道规范解读(上)

作者:冯晓鹏 李思然 金杜律师事务所合规业务部

近日,国家互联网信息办公室(以下简称“网信办”)下属网络安全审查办公室(以下简称“网安办”)密集发布公告,对若干家境外上市互联网企业启动网络安全审查。[1]该消息一出,舆论一片哗然。在网安办启动网络安全审查的一周后,网信办随即于7月10日发布《网络安全审查办法(修订草案征求意见稿)》,规定“掌握超过100万用户个人信息的运营者赴国外上市,必须向网络安全审查办公室申报网络安全审查。”

本次多部门合力开展网络安全审查,证明了监管的强硬态度、力度和范围。[2]面对如此高规格的安全审查以及释放出来的强监管信号,涉及大量数据运营的互联网企业该何去何从。

随着大数据时代的到来,数据审查与合规愈发成为监管重点。数据收集、使用、管理和流转过程中涉及的国家安全和个人隐私问题触碰着监管者和企业的敏感神经。尽管本次受监管的商业平台属于境内的网络服务交易平台,涉及国家地理、道路、交通、人员出行等敏感信息,跨境电商企业绝不能掉以轻心,亟需关注数据审查和监管合规的最新发展,关注相关立法进展及实务动向。跨境电商作为大数据时代中的“重数据资产”企业,掌握海量用户购买消费记录和隐私信息,及涉及信息出境问题,更应该注重日常数据运营及国外上市的合法合规。本文拟从跨境电商日常数据运营环节出发,结合《网络安全法》、《网络安全审查办法(修订草案征求意见稿)》、以及个人信息出境有关规范性文件的梳理,分析跨境电商企业在数据审查和合规中常见的监管要求。 Continue Reading 论网络安全审查及个人信息出境新规对跨境电商数据运营之影响

作者:武鹏 乐宇歆 金杜律师事务所争议解决部

近年来,我们财富管理团队所处理的大量婚姻家事案件中各种房屋确权纠纷日益增多,一方面是房价持续维持在高位水平,导致案涉利益巨大,容易引发纷争;另一方面的因素是国家购房政策收紧,借名买房等不规范操作增多,导致纠纷频发。

那么,借名买房(又或者房产代持)是否合法?这样一种交易安排,对于出借和借用名字的双方都存在哪些法律风险呢?事实上,因房产代持引起的各种争议中,大量的实际出资人无法取回属于自己的房产,导致资产损失,而出借(名)人也面临被限购或各种信用风险。

继我们团队前一篇《转账有风险、出资需谨慎——隐得了的名却绕不过的身份纠葛》一文中,对金融产品代持进行梳理之后,本篇对借名买房的房产代持行为进行重点阐述

Continue Reading 借名买房?——有多少风险可以共担